The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.
What Kind of Discrimination Does the Voting Rights Act Target?
Responding to Christopher S. Elmendorf
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes
Custom, Codification, and the Verdict of History
One Market We Do Not Need
Communications, Technology, and Present Sense Impressions
Responding to Jeffrey Bellin
Facebook, Twitter, and the Uncertain Future of Present Sense Impressions
Facebook, Twitter, and the Uncertain Future of Present Sense Impressions
Section 2 is Dead: Long Live Section 2
Responding to Christopher S. Elmendorf
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes
Justice Kennedy to the Rescue?
Responding to Christopher S. Elmendorf
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes