Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.



What Kind of Discrimination Does the Voting Rights Act Target?
Christopher S. Elmendorf
Responding to Christopher S. Elmendorf
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes

Custom, Codification, and the Verdict of History

Jean Galbraith
Responding to Timothy Meyer
Codifying Custom

One Market We Do Not Need
Giovanna Shay
Responding to Alexander Volokh
Prison Vouchers

Communications, Technology, and Present Sense Impressions
Susan W. Brenner
Responding to Jeffrey Bellin
Facebook, Twitter, and the Uncertain Future of Present Sense Impressions

Section 2 is Dead: Long Live Section 2
Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Responding to Christopher S. Elmendorf
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes

Justice Kennedy to the Rescue?
Luis Fuentes-Rohwer
Responding to Christopher S. Elmendorf
Making Sense of Section 2: Of Biased Votes, Unconstitutional Elections, and Common Law Statutes

Fraud on the Market: An Action Without a Cause
Amanda M. Rose
Responding to William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter
The Political Economy of Fraud on the Market

Securities Class Action as Public Law
James D. Cox
Responding to William W. Bratton & Michael L. Wachter
The Political Economy of Fraud on the Market

The Role of Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and Scholars in the Normative Evaluation of Timing Rules
Frank Fagan & Michael Faure
Responding to Rebecca M. Kysar
Lasting Legislation

Constitutional Challenges to the Health Care Mandate: Based in Politics, Not Law
David Orentlicher
Responding to Mark A. Hall
Commerce Clause Challenges to Health Care Reform

Fees, Incentives, and Deterrence
Linda Sandstrom Simard
Responding to Brian T. Fitzpatrick
Do Class Action Lawyers Make Too Little?

Humanity and Law
Michael Serota
Responding to Christine Stark
Run
158 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1575