Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.



Fateful Bankers
David Zaring
Responding to Saule T. Omarova
Wall Street as Community of Fate: Toward Financial Industry Self-Regulation

Financial Industry Self-Regulation: Aspiration and Reality
Steven L. Schwarcz
Responding to Saule T. Omarova
Wall Street as Community of Fate: Toward Financial Industry Self-Regulation

Attorneys' Fees and the Social Legitimacy of Class Actions
David Marcus
Responding to Brian T. Fitzpatrick
Do Class Action Lawyers Make Too Little?

The Partner-Manager: Some Thoughts on Bebchuk and Fried
Lawrence E. Mitchell
Responding to Lucian A. Bebchuk & Jesse M. Fried
Paying for Long-Term Performance

Weak Solutions to an Illusory Problem
Steven N. Kaplan
Responding to Lucian A. Bebchuk & Jesse M. Fried
Paying for Long-Term Performance