Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.




Is Accomplice Liability Superfluous?

R.A. Duff

Moore on Complicity and Causality

John Gardner

Antitrust Enforcement in the Health Care Industry: A Battleground of Competing Paradigms

James F. Blumstein

Some Questions About Emotions and Risk Evaluation

Michael Stocker

Diverse Conceptions of Emotions in Risk Regulation

Peter H. Huang

Emotions, Values, and the Construction of Risk

Susan A. Bandes

Judicial Review of Election Administration

Daniel P. Tokaji

Setting the Bar Too High

Frank I. Michelman

The Impact of Enforcement: A Reflection

Howell E. Jackson
Responding to John C. Coffee, Jr.
Law and the Market: The Impact of Enforcement

Rule of (Out)law: Property's Contingent Right to Exclude

Elizabeth M. Glazer
Responding to Eduardo Moisés Peñalver & Sonia K. Katyal
Property Outlaws

Rethinking Copyright: Property Through the Lenses of Unjust Enrichment and Unfair Competition

Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Responding to Sara K. Stadler
Copyright as Trade Regulation

Lessons from Outlaws

Laura S. Underkuffler
Responding to Eduardo Moisés Peñalver & Sonia K. Katyal
Property Outlaws

Property In-Laws

Nicole Stelle Garnett
Responding to Eduardo Moisés Peñalver & Sonia K. Katyal
Property Outlaws

Order with Outlaws?

Lee Anne Fennell
Responding to Eduardo Moisés Peñalver & Sonia K. Katyal
Property Outlaws

American Buffalo: Vanishing Acquittals and the Gradual Extinction of the Federal Criminal Trial Lawyer

Frank O. Bowman, III

Judging Untried Cases

Daniel Richman

What’s Good About Trials?

Michael M. O’Hear

A Nuanced Approach to the Disability Integration Presumption

Mark C. Weber

Just Following Orders

Roderick M. Hills, Jr.

Abolish the Integration Presumption? Not Yet

Samuel R. Bagenstos
156 U.Pa. L.Rev. PENNumbra 157 (2007)

In Defense of Complete Preemption

Paul E. McGreal
Responding to Gil Seinfeld
The Puzzle of Complete Preemption

The Geography of Family Privacy

David D. Meyer
Responding to Laura A. Rosenbury
Between Home and School

Evidence, Unfairness, and Market-Share Liability: A Comment on Geistfeld

Benjamin C. Zipursky