Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.




The Creditors' Bargain Reconstituted: Comments on Barry Adler's The Creditors' Bargain Revisited

Edward J. Janger
167 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 47 (2019)
Responding to Barry E. Adler
The Creditors' Bargain Revisited
166 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1853 (2018)

Is the Staggered Board Debate Really Settled?

K.J. Martijn Cremers, Simone M. Sepe & Saura Masconale
167 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 9 (2019)
Responding to Yakov Amihud, Markus Schmid & Steven Davidoff Solomon
Settling the Staggered Board Debate
166 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1475 (2018)

The Bankruptcy Firm

Vincent S.J. Buccola
167 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 1 (2019)
Responding to Douglas G. Baird, Anthony J. Casey & Randal C. Picker
The Bankruptcy Partition
166 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1675 (2018)