Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.




Auditing Algorithms for Discrimination

Pauline T. Kim
166 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 189 (2017)
Responding to Joshua A. Kroll, Joanna Huey, Solon Barocas, Edward W. Felten, Joel R. Reidenberg, David G. Robinson & Harlan Yu
Accountable Algorithms
165 U Pa. L. Rev. 633 (2017)

Nondelegation Doctrine in Comparative Context: Britain’s Great Repeal Bill and the Shadow of Henry VIII

Rene Reyes
166 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 71 (2017)
Responding to Keith E. Whittington & Jason Iuliano
The Myth of the Nondelegation Doctrine
165 U. Pa. L. Rev. 379 (2017).

Contextualizing Shadow Conversations

James J. Brudney
166 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 37 (2017)
Responding to Christopher J. Walker
Legislating in the Shadows
165 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1377 (2017)