Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.




Things Left Unsaid, Questions Not Asked

Peter L. Strauss
164 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 293 (2016)
Responding to Cass R. Sunstein
The Most Knowledgeable Branch
164 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1607 (2016)

Perverse Incentives, Cost‐Benefit Imbalances, and the Infield Fly Rule

Howard M. Wasserman
164 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 145 (2016).
Responding to Andrew J. Guilford & Joel Mallord
Time to Drop the Infield Fly Rule and End a Common Law Anomaly
164 U. Pa. L. Rev. 281 (2015).

Writing About Nonpersons

Andrew Jensen Kerr
164 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 77 (2016).
Responding to Brandon L. Garrett
The Constitutional Standing of Corporations
163 U. Pa. L. Rev. 95 (2014).