Responses - University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host responses to any scholarly content published by the University of Pennsylvania Law Review, including print articles, Law Review Online Debates, or even other Law Review Online Responses. We prefer Responses that do not exceed 4,500 words within the main text, and 2,000 words within the footnotes. Scholars interested in contributing to Penn Law Review Online should visit our Submissions page.




Access to Counsel, Res Judicata, and the Future of Habeas at Guantanamo

Stephen I. Vladeck
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 78 (2012)
Responding to Andrew Kent
Do Boumediene Rights Expire?
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. PENNumbra 20 (2012)

Learning to Live with (a Little) Uncertainty: The Operational Aspects and Consequences of the Geography of Conflict Debate

Laurie R. Blank
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 347 (2013)

The Underwhelming Benefits of Big Data

Paul Ohm
Responding to Paul M. Schwartz
Information Privacy in the Cloud
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1623 (2013)

What Is Localist Judging and Why Does It Matter?

Paul A. Diller
Responding to Ethan J. Leib
Localist Statutory Interpretation
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 897 (2013)

E-Sports As a Prism for the Role of Evolving Technology in Intellectual Property

Jennifer E. Rothman
Responding to Dan L. Burk
Owning E-Sports: Proprietary Rights in Professional Computer Gaming
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1535 (2013)

What's "Active Intermediaries" Got to Do with It?

Jerry Kang
Responding to Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
Trust and Online Interaction
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1579 (2013)

W(h)ither Bivens

James E. Pfander & David P. Baltmanis
Responding to Carlos M. Vázquez & Stephen I. Vladeck
State Law, the Westfall Act, and the Nature of the Bivens Question
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 509 (2013)

Catch-All Doctrinalism and Judicial Desire

Anya Bernstein
Responding to Carlos M. Vázquez & Stephen I. Vladeck
State Law, the Westfall Act, and the Nature of the Bivens Question
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 509 (2013)

Finding the Proper Measure for Conditions of Pretrial Confinement

Alexander A. Reinert
Responding to Catherine T. Struve
The Conditions of Pretrial Detention
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1009 (2013)

Commandeering Information (And Informing the Commandeered)

Anthony Johnstone
Responding to Robert A. Mikos
Can the States Keep Secrets from the Federal Government?
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 103 (2012)

Fracking and Federalism Choice

Michael Burger
Responding to David B. Spence
Federalism, Regulatory Lags, and the Political Economy of Energy Production
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 431 (2013)

Property's Perspective (Or of Whom to be Jealous)

Nadav Shoked

It's Not Triage if the Patient Bleeds Out

John Pollock & Michael S. Greco
Responding to Benjamin H. Barton & Stephanos Bibas
Triaging Appointed-Counsel Funding and Pro Se Access to Justice