' /> ' />
Article   |   Volume 161, Issue 4

The Conditions of Pretrial Detention

Catherine T. Struve
161 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1009 (2013)

March 2013

The Supreme Court has set forth in detail the standards that govern convicted prisoners' Eighth Amendment claims concerning their conditions of confinement, but has left undefined the standards for comparable claims by pretrial detainees. The law articulated by the lower courts is unclear and inconsistent, but on the whole shows a trend toward assimilating pretrial detainees' claims to those of convicted prisoners. Based on a review of Supreme Court case law concerning related questions, this Article argues that, for claims arising after a judicial determination of probable cause, the tests now prevailing in the lower courts should be replaced by a substantive due process framework that requires a plaintiff to show, at most, either punitive intent or objective deliberate indifference by the defendant. For claims arising after a warrantless arrest and before a judicial determination of probable cause, the Fourth Amendment's objective reasonableness standard should govern. The Article further notes a strong argument that this objective reasonableness standard should govern prior to arraignment, even when the arrest took place upon a warrant.

The Conditions of Pretrial Detention - PennLawReview.com

Responses to this Article
Alexander A. Reinert

 Previous Article

Neighborhood Empowerment and the Future of the City

Kenneth A. Stahl