Debates - University of Pennsylvania Law Review
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host debates between respected scholars on current controversies. The format includes an opening statement, a rebuttal, and closing statements by each side. Each contribution is expected to be one to two times the length of an average opinion/editorial newspaper article (i.e., 1,000-2,000 words), and without footnotes. Scholars interested in participating in a Penn Law Review Online Debate should visit our Submissions page.

Judicial Recusal and the Court

Sherrilyn A. Ifill & Eric J. Segall

America Invents, More or Less?

Jason Rantanen & Lee Petherbridge & Jay P. Kesan

The Alien Tort Statute and Corporate Liability

Susan Farbstein & Tyler Giannini & Anthony Clark Arend

Climate Change and the Courts

Jason Scott Johnston & Heidi M. Hurd