In “Retributive Damages” and the Death of Private Ordering, Professor Michael Krauss explores the implications of Markel's retributive damages for the private ordering/public ordering divide. Relying on Aristotle's conception of corrective justice and eighteenth‐century common law, Krauss makes the philosophical and historical case for the proper, limited role of punitive damages. He argues that punitive damages are only legitimate where used to close loopholes in conventional tort law remedies—e.g., as compensation for moral offenses. Accordingly, he contends that the retributive use of punitive damages is a pollution of tort law by public ordering principles. Finally, even for those who accept the theoretical premise of retributive damages, Krauss identifies several potential problems with Markel's scheme—theoretical, practical, and constitutional.
“Retributive Damages” and the Death of Private Ordering
- Michael I. Krauss
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on email
Share on print
(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)
- Professor of Law, George Mason University Law School. E-mail: email@example.com. Thanks to George Mason’s Law and Economics Center for its support and to Lindsey Champlin for her research assistance.