Is Accomplice Liability Superfluous?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on email
Share on print

Professor Duff explores the “third and fourth desert bases Moore identifies” and argues “that there is still some room for a distinctive doctrine of complicity and thus for accomplice liability as a distinctive type of liability.” Duff focuses on the mens rea of accomplice liability, specifically that of intentionality and foresight, and ultimately claims “that, even if all that Moore says about the actus reus is right, it does not warrant his conclusion” that there is no unique desert basis for accomplice liability.

(Visited 34 times, 1 visits today)