October 13, 2023
8AM – 5PM
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review is proud to partner with Curtis Bradley (University of Chicago) and Jack Goldsmith (Harvard) to present a symposium on the statutory foreign affairs presidency.Despite the perennial debates about the scope of the President’s constitutional authority, we have today a largely statutory president, even in foreign affairs. Most important actions that presidents take have some connection to a statute. This means that the law governing statutory authorization and delegation—a mix of constitutional law, interpretive principles, and administrative doctrine—has become central to questions of executive power. President Biden’s various forms of support for Ukraine, and his sharp restrictions on economic interaction with China, are ultimately connected to statutes. Many of President Trump’s controversial actions, including the travel ban and the emergency border wall funding, were justified as delegations from Congress. For over two decades, the “war on terrorism” has been fought primarily based on a 2001 statute and series of congressional appropriations. The vast majority of binding international agreements made by the executive branch purport to be authorized by Congress. There are many more examples.To understand the modern foreign affairs presidency, one must know how to assess and interpret the statutory bases for presidential action. And yet there is an enormous array of unresolved questions about the right way to approach these issues, even as the issues grow increasingly important.In recent years, the Supreme Court has become much more focused on issues of delegation and authorization and has raised new questions about how these issues should be resolved in the foreign relations law context. Some justices have supported a revival of a stricter nondelegation doctrine. But the same justices in the vanguard on this issue have indicated that foreign affairs delegations should be treated more generously. Some commentators, however, have started to question that exceptionalism for foreign affairs delegations, on both historical and theoretical grounds.In the meantime, the Supreme Court has been applying a “major questions doctrine,” and there is uncertainty about how that doctrine applies in the foreign affairs context. This question is further complicated by past decisions in which the Supreme Court has suggested that statutory delegations of foreign affairs authority should be construed more generously than delegations of domestic authority, in light of Congress’s awareness of the executive branch’s functional advantages in the foreign affairs arena.This symposium seeks to bring together diverse scholars to publish leading scholarship addressing the many unresolved and unaddressed questions of statutory delegations of foreign affairs powers.Registration & Contact Info
Please register for the symposium here:https://www.eventbrite.com/e/the-statutory-foreign-affairs-presidency-tickets-714230531747
Please contact symposium@pennlawreview.com with any questions.A livestream will be available. Please register for a virtual ticket on EventBrite and we will send you a link to the livestream. Attorneys attending remotely will be eligible to receive CLE credits if they pay the requisite fees (see below for more information).CLE InformationThis program has been approved for 7.0 Substantive CLE credits for Pennsylvania lawyers. CLE credit may be available in other jurisdictions as well. Attendees seeking CLE credit must register for CLE credit and make a payment via the online CLE registration link in the amount of $280.00 ($140.00 public interest/non-profit attorneys). In order to receive the appropriate amount of credit, passcodes provided throughout the program must be noted in your evaluation form.Penn Carey Law Alumni receive CLE credits free through The W.P. Carey Foundation’s generous commitment to Lifelong Learning.Schedule8:00 to 8:30 a.m. Registration and Refreshments
8:30 to 9:00 a.m. Introductory Remarks
9:00 to 10:30 a.m. Panel 1: Nondelegation and Foreign Affairs
Moderator: Cary Coglianese, University of Pennsylvania
Paper Presenters:
Curtis Bradley, University of Chicago
Jack Goldsmith, Harvard
Nicholas Parrillo, Yale
Commentators:
Elena Chachko, UC Berkeley
10:30 to 10:45 a.m. Break
10:45 to 12:15 p.m. Panel 2: Regulating Trade and Commerce
Moderator: David Zaring, Wharton School
Paper Presenters:
Aditya Bamzai, Virginia
Kathleen Claussen, Georgetown
Timothy Meyer, Duke
Commentators:
J. Benton Heath, Temple
12:15 to 1 p.m. Lunch
1 to 2 p.m. Keynote Conversation
John Bellinger III, Arnold & Porter
Andrew Keller, Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC)
Hon. Diane Wood, U.S. Circuit Court, 7th Circuit
2 to 3:30 p.m. Panel 3: International Commitments and Delegation
Moderator: Mary DeRosa, Georgetown
Paper Presenters:
Kristen Eichensehr, Virginia
Jean Galbraith, University of Pennsylvania
Oona Hathaway, Yale
Commentators:
Shalev Roisman, Arizona
3:30 to 3:45 p.m. Break
3:45 to 5:15 p.m. Panel 4: National Security and Rights
Moderator: Beth Simmons, University of Pennsylvania
Paper Presenters:
Anupam Chander, Georgetown
Ashley Deeks, Virginia
Paul Schwartz, UC Berkeley
Commentators:
Chris Mirasola, Harvard
5:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Concluding Remarks
October 7, 2022
8AM – 5PM
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
Recordings of the Symposium’s panels are available here.
Volume 171 of the University of Pennsylvania Law Review is proud to present its annual symposium on a timely legal topic.Over the last decade, low interest rates and aggressive quantitative easing have resulted in strong demand for high-yield investments. Corporate borrowers have enjoyed unique leverage and have been able to draft debt instruments with fewer creditor safeguards and various trap doors.Private equity sponsors have led this charge, and some players have recently begun exploiting contractual loopholes to seize value in distress scenarios. Creditors are being pitted against other creditors in an ever-radicalizing model. These nascent battles—which have been observed at several prominent companies, including Caesars Entertainment, Neiman Marcus, and J.Crew—raise concerns about the potential harm to the U.S. economy if a financial downturn leads to a battle for control over some of the nation’s largest companies.The effect of this credit-on-creditor violence is difficult to assess because the facets are not fully understood. Shifts in creditor and lender composition have exacerbated the complexity and opacity of the leveraged loan and distressed debt markets – rendering these markets more susceptible to downturns and amplifying contagion risks for global economies.This interdisciplinary symposium seeks to bring together diverse scholars to address the new dynamics that are reshaping the field. It also seeks to create a dialogue among scholars and practitioners of finance, bankruptcy law, capital markets, and economics. We hope to be at the leading edge of private equity’s next phase.The University of Pennsylvania Law Review is proud to partner with Vince Buccola (Wharton), Elisabeth de Fontenay (Duke), Sujeet Indap (Financial Times), Samir Parikh (Lewis & Clark), and Katherine Waldock (the Millstein Center at Columbia) to present this Symposium. The Law Review thanks Platinum sponsor Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz and Gold sponsors Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP and Kirkland & Ellis for helping make this event possible.Registration & Contact Info
Please register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/debt-market-complexity-shadowed-practices-and-financial-injustice-tickets-414384183247Please contact symposium@pennlawreview.com with any questions.A livestream will be available. Please register for a virtual ticket on EventBrite and we will send you a link to the livestream. Attorneys attending remotely will be eligible to receive CLE credits if they pay the requisite fees (see below for more information)Schedule
8:00 to 8:30 a.m. Registration and Refreshments
8:30 to 9:00 a.m. Introductory Remarks
9:00 to 10:30 a.m. Panel 1:The Leveraged Loan Market and the Impending Buyout Bust
Brief Description: The U.S. leveraged loan market, which stood at just over $100 billion two decades ago, caught up to the size of the U.S. high-yield bond market – roughly $1.6 trillion in amounts outstanding – in 2021. Although banks still hold a majority of leveraged loans, NBFIs are significant market participants, particularly in the non-investment grade loan sector. Control rights vary across loan types. These market features raise questions about whether leveraged loans are more susceptible to fire sales and potentially lead to differences in the bargaining process during distressed work-outs and restructurings. They also raise the broad question about the gradual shift from bonds to loans in riskier debt markets. This panel will address these questions while laying the empirical groundwork for distressed debt markets that will inform the panels that follow.
Moderator: Katherine Waldock, Millstein Center at Columbia
Tony Casey,University of Chicago
Jared Ellias, Harvard
Edith Hotchkiss, Boston College
Edward Morrison, Columbia
David Skeel, University of Pennsylvania
10:30 to 10:45 a.m. Break
10:45 to 12:15 p.m. Panel 2:Contracting Complexity and the Rise of Shadowed Practices: How Private Equity Dictates Outcomes
Brief Description: Debt instruments fail to address and resolve the most challenging disputes between parties, despite their increasing length and complexity. Bondholders could demand the inclusion of provisions to better protect their positions and reduce the risk of equity sponsor gamesmanship. But sponsors have successfully negotiated for “loose” debt contracts that preserve the optionality that is often necessary in the precarious post-LBO world. In the low-interest environment that has existed over the last 10 years, bondholders have been willing to go along in exchange for higher yields. Ex ante measures to avoid collateral skirmishes have proven elusive. The resolution void has emboldened equity sponsors to exploit their considerable relationship and financial leverage, pursuing unprecedented hostile acts against creditors to preserve equity stakes.
Moderator: Elisabeth de Fontenay, Duke
Kenneth Ayotte, UC Berkeley
Matt Jennejohn, BYU
Samir Parikh, Lewis & Clark
Jeffrey Dutson, King & Spalding
George Triantis, Stanford
12:15 to 1 p.m. Lunch
1 to 2 p.m. Keynote Conversation: Matt Levine, Bloomberg Opinion & Sujeet Indap, Financial Times
2 to 3:30 p.m. Panel 3: Creditors Strike Back
Brief Description: Equity sponsors have adopted unprecedented levels of aggression towards creditors, exploiting debt contracts to transfer value from creditors to equity holders. These new tactics initially left creditors paralyzed, but creditors have started fighting back. This panel will unpack all of the traditional and evolutionary tactics creditors are employing to protect their positions.
Moderator: Sujeet Indap, Financial Times
Bruce Bennett, Jones Day
Joshua Feltman, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Nicole Greenblatt, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Ted Goldthorpe, BC Partners
3:30 to 3:45 p.m. Break
3:45 to 5:15 p.m. Panel 4: The Judicial Role in the New Order
Brief Description: The new dynamics of lending and private equity ownership pose questions about how disputes among creditors, debtors, and their owners should be resolved. Familiar judicial norms and practices calibrated to an environment with influential senior lenders may not be optimal for an environment in which sponsors set the agenda. This panel will explore the challenges judges are beginning to face in and out of Chapter 11.
Moderator: Vincent Buccola, The Wharton School
Douglas Baird, University of Chicago
Ronit Berkovich, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Hon. Craig Goldblatt, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware
Robert Rasmussen, University of Southern California
5:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Concluding Remarks
Time: All Day
Date: February 18-19, 2022
Where: Zoom
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review is partnering with Professor Jasmine Harris and Professor Karen Tani to present a symposium entitled “The Disability Frame: Opportunities, Costs, and Constraints in the Broad Struggle for Inclusion.”
At the heart of this symposium is the legal concept of disability. This concept has now been enlisted to address a surprising array of problems: not only disability-based discrimination and exclusion, but also the risk of COVID-19 transmission in schools, the subordination of transgender individuals, the casualties of modern capitalism, and the remediation of poverty and environmental harms, to name just a handful of examples. And yet there has been scant acknowledgment or discussion of the choice to enlist disability in these myriad ways. This symposium seeks to initiate much-needed conversation. This symposium also acknowledges that disability is not only a legal concept, but also a social construct, a lived reality, and for many individuals, a chosen identity. It is time for scholars, policymakers, activists, and present and future lawyers to grapple with the complexity of the “the disability frame” and think collectively about its implications.
The symposium will be held via Zoom on February 18-19. For more information, please reach out to Matthew Seelig at mseelig@pennlaw.upenn.edu.
REGISTRATION: https://pennlaw.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_t-N7uC-BShm1oufopSg1rw
We strive to be as inclusive as possible. To that end, here is some information about how this event will go. We have an ASL interpreter and also manual closed captioning as standard accommodations for each panel and speaker during the symposium. We will orally identify ourselves when we are speaking. When we are speaking for the first time, we will describe our visual appearance. In all instances, we will state our name before we speak. If a speaker shows a slide, they will describe and explain what is on the slide. We encourage participants to use plain language whenever possible and define (or avoid) acronyms.
We have a few channels by which to ask questions. Anybody may type a question in the Q&A tab. We will have a moderator read questions, unless the person asking the question prefers to ask orally. To ask your question orally, please indicate you would like to do so in the body of your question or alternatively, you may simply raise your electronic hand. We will then allow you to unmute yourself to ask the question. Finally, we will have a phone line, where anyone can call in to ask a question. That number is (215) 898-7060. You may also use this number to make accommodation requests or report technology issues. You may also alert us to issues via the chat.
This program has been approved for 3.0 Substantive and 4.5 Ethics CLE credits for Pennsylvania lawyers. CLE credit may be available in other jurisdictions as well. Attendees seeking CLE credit must register for CLE credit and make a payment via the online CLE registration link in the amount of $300.00 ($150.00 public interest/non-profit attorneys). In order to receive the appropriate amount of credit, passcodes provided throughout the program must be noted in your evaluation form.
Penn Law Alumni receive CLE credits free through The W.P. Carey Foundation’s generous commitment to Lifelong Learning.
DAY 1 – Friday, February 18, 2022
DAY 2 – Saturday, February 19, 2022
Time: All Day
Date: February 12-13, 2021
Where: Zoom
No other living scholar in the field of Civil Procedure has reached more broadly or had greater impact than Professor Stephen Burbank. In 1982, Professor Burbank published “The Rules Enabling Act of 1934,” an exhaustively researched account of the passage of the statute that would lead to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If Professor Burbank had never published another article, his position in the firmament of the field of procedure would have been secure.
But, of course, Professor Burbank went on to become one of the most prolific legal scholars of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. He is the author or co-author of four books and over one hundred law review articles and book chapters that span a remarkable breadth of study and methodology. Professor Burbank’s work covers both American and international procedure alongside conflict of laws and judicial administration. He was also among the first wave of scholars to embrace rigorous interdisciplinary approaches to legal scholarship, including historical, empirical, and comparative methods.
This year, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review and the University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law present a festschrift honoring Professor Burbank’s scholarship. The Festschrift is an honored tradition in American academic life. Its purpose is to celebrate the work of a great scholar through contributions from colleagues and former students. These original works of scholarship celebrate Professor Burbank by exploring and building on the most important themes of his work, illustrating how today’s cutting-edge scholarship can trace its lineage back to his body of academic work.
Reflecting its honoree’s career, this symposium brings together leading scholars in civil procedure and judicial administration along with renowned jurists and highlights new scholarship in international and comparative procedure and interdisciplinary approaches. This symposium also looks forward to the future of the field and new avenues of inquiry inspired by Professor Burbank’s work.
REGISTRATION: https://pennlaw.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_f6AAaLSrRnaAmWbFONw9iw
This program has been approved for 8.5 total CLE credits (7.0 substantive credit and 1.5 ethics credit) for Pennsylvania lawyers. CLE credit may be available in other jurisdictions as well. Attendees seeking CLE credit must register for CLE credit and make a payment via the online CLE registration link in the amount of $340.00 ($170.00 public interest/non-profit attorneys). In order to receive the appropriate amount of credit, passcodes provided throughout the program must be noted in your evaluation form.
Penn Law Alumni receive CLE credits free through The W.P. Carey Foundation’s generous commitment to Lifelong Learning.
DAY 1 – Friday, February 12
DAY 2 – Saturday, February 13
