Debates - University of Pennsylvania Law Review
The University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online is pleased to host debates between respected scholars on current controversies. The format includes an opening statement, a rebuttal, and closing statements by each side. Each contribution is expected to be one to two times the length of an average opinion/editorial newspaper article (i.e., 1,000-2,000 words), and without footnotes. Scholars interested in participating in a Penn Law Review Online Debate should visit our Submissions page.




Off-Label Drug Promotion and the First Amendment

Stephanie M. Greene & Lars Noah
162 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 239 (2014).

The Constitutionality of Stop-and-Frisk in New York City

David Rudovsky & Lawrence Rosenthal
162 U. Pa. L. Rev. Online 117 (2013)